Skip to content

Igor Gatis

← Customer Feedback for ServiceStack

My feedback

1 result found

  1. Allow customization of ModelDefinition in ORM Lite

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Igor Gatis commented  · 

    I managed to make this work for protobuf-csharp-classes. The answer is here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31420049/is-there-way-to-use-protobuf-csharp-port-generated-classes-with-servicestack-orm/31710296#31710296

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Igor Gatis commented  · 

    Answering admin's comment:

    I forgot to mention protobuf-csharp-port generted classes have no null properties. Instead of comparing the property to null, one must check .HasPropertyX.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Igor Gatis commented  · 

    I'd like to use OrmLite with protobuf-csharp-port generated classes.

    Each entity has two generated classes:
    1. "Foo" which is immutable (like String)
    2. "Foo.Builder" which is mutable and produces a "Foo" when .Build() is called (like StringBuilder and .ToString()).

    I cannot use Foo because it has no setters. Although I can work around Foo.Builder's name with [Alias("Foo")], it has a bunch of properties which must not become columns. The list is bigger but I think these gives the picture.

    Igor Gatis supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)