Skip to content

Johann Klemmack

← Customer Feedback for ServiceStack

My feedback

13 results found

  1. please add basic upsert functionality

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    @TRich - this is already implemented by the "Save" APIs

  2. Support AbortController API in servicestack-client

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I have issued PR 20 to the github repo to support this - https://github.com/ServiceStack/servicestack-client/pull/20

    Johann Klemmack supported this idea  · 

  3. SDK Documentation

    68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johann Klemmack supported this idea  · 

  4. Encrypted messaging javascript client

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johann Klemmack shared this idea  · 

  5. Built-in Active Directory Authentication suport.

    163 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    @Steve I had some related issues with my users, esp. when they were using IE vs. Chrome. In IIS for the website, I went to "Authentication" module -> Windows Authentication -> Providers (on the right) and changed the order to [ NTLM, Negotiate]

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I'm sure this can be implemented with appropriate AD config, but I'd add support for Azure Active Directory as well.

  6. Allow Stored Procedure for Primary Key

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    Do you mean to *generate* the primary key via stored proc, or truly have it as a calculated column? If generate, you could always decorate the property in the POCO with "[PrimaryKey]" ,then use an insert trigger to generate the value.

  7. provide support for ftp file upload

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    Do you mean via the JsonClient? Or within server-side ServiceStack?

  8. Management Overview Dashboard

    231 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I'd love to see stats around route / DTO performance. I.e., for a given parameterized (ie, strip the parameters) route, show the number of requests, average / max times, etc. I can get some of that via IIS logs, but I have to manually massage out non-query string parameters.

    Some other nice-to-have information would be Reids / Cache size, and, via mini-profiler or the like, some sense of DB IO (avg queries / request, queries /sec, DB vs. service time).

  9. Add BulkInsert/Bulk Copy to the ormlite databases you can

    121 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I've used SqlBulkCopy frequently, and I often have to "tweak" the load parameters. To make this effective, and cross-DB compatible, we'd have to make a BulkLoaderFactory(tablename) Further, I suspect we'd have to create DB-provider-specific "BulkLoader" class that abstracts the most common interfaces....

  10. OrmLite CodeFirst Schema Migrations

    115 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I've been poking some at this for my own use. The "easiest" approach is if there are two schemas (before & after) and you could migrate between them. However, that defeats some of the benefits of ServiceStack (resilient DTOs, sharing DTO with DB schema). The other approach is to infer the ModelDef from the database, but that could get gnarly quickly. Preference on approach?

  11. Azure DocumentDB caching provider

    23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johann Klemmack shared this idea  · 

  12. Deeper SignalR Integration

    151 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    started  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    The way ServiceStack and SignalR will be able to integrate in future will be through .NET Core’s IApplicationBuilder pipeline which by design supports running multiple frameworks within the same App that can now share the same default route namespace.

    From the v4.5.2, ServiceStack now supports running on .NET Core, please see the guide in the full release notes which shows how to register ServiceStack’s AppHost in .NET Core: http://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v4.5.2.html

    SignalR for .NET Core has yet to be released but it’s expected you’ll be able to access SignalR via its dependencies registered in .NET Core’s Startup which will also be injected in your Services like normal IOC dependencies.

    We’ll update this feature request again with an example showing a demo of ServiceStack + SignalR together in the same App once SignalR is available on .NET Core in 2017.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    I've completed an initial typed C# client implementation at https://github.com/jklemmack/ServerSentEvents4ServiceStack. This repo also has a lighter-weight server implementation, where the "data" elements are raw DTOs, and the "event" field is used to govern the categorization of messages.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    Any plans on a JsonServiceClient-based C# EventSource client?

  13. Allow filtering of services on metadata page by endpoint

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johann Klemmack commented  · 

    Lukas - You can always write a custom HTML template to implement this on your own.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)