My feedback

1 result found

1. Add WebSocket support to ServiceStack

   71 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   6 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   We’ve added support for Server Sent Events (SSE) as an integrated Server Notifications option that can be used as an alternative for Web Sockets at: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Server-Events

   Laurence Evans supported this idea  ·  Jul 5, 2014
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Laurence Evans commented  ·  Jul 5, 2014  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   @Kunjan, SignalR and websocket support are different things. SignalR is primarily built for small message, distributed comms while websocket is a full-duplex tcp-based protocol without any such restrictions.

   2 issues I've run into myself when trying to use signalr to do some out of the ordinary use case stuff.
   https://github.com/SignalR/SignalR/issues/1114
   https://github.com/SignalR/SignalR/issues/1205

   Doing the same (sending an image) over websocket (XSockets implementation) was trivial and had no such issues.

   If ServiceStack had websocket support that'd be pretty awesome, it would allow for the creation of duplex comms in a somewhat standardised manner.

   Save Submitting...