162 results found

1. ExcludePropertyReferences for Data Contracts

   Currently ExcludePropertyReferences is expecting DeclaringTypeName.DataContractName. Its more helpful if the type is fully qualified.

   for example ; from below Json if we want to exclude :{"Officeaddress.houseaddress.city"}; .

   Json:
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   {"id":"eb26f100-3758-4a19-806b-cd5af44f88a4","data":{"lname":"Talluri","firstname":"RamaNaresh","city":"Atlanta"},"collections":{"houseaddress":[{"id":"126e057d-e91b-42ec-b40d-bdba9c831d64","data":{"city":"CAToronto"}}],"officeaddress":[{"id":"5ff48bd4-bfe2-4721-adf1-3f5cd3b5c736","data":{"city":"USAlpharetta"},"collections":{"houseaddress":[{"id":"aad21efc-2768-4518-a505-71dc8b82ad40","data":{"city":"CA_Downtown"}}]}}]}}
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Model :
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   [DataContract]
   public class AddressModel : BaseModel
   {
   [DataMember(Name = "id")]
   public System.Guid Id
   {
   get;
   set;
   }

       [DataMember(Name = "data")]
       public virtual BaseAddress Data
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "collections")]
       public virtual AddressCollection Collections
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class BaseAddress
   {
   
       [DataMember(Name = "lname")]
       public string LastName
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
       [DataMember(Name = "firstname")]
       public string FirstName
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
       [DataMember(Name = "city")]
       public string City
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   }
   
   
   [DataContract()]
   public class AddressCollection
   {
   
       [DataMember(Name = "houseaddress")]
       public virtual List<HAdddress> HAdddress{get; set;}
   
   
       [DataMember(Name = "officeaddress")]
       public virtual List<OAdddress> OAdddress { get; set; }
   
   }
   
   
   [DataContract]
   public class HAdddress
   {
       [DataMember(Name = "id")]
       public System.Guid Id
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "data")]
       public virtual HAddressData Data
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class OAdddress
   {
       [DataMember(Name = "id")]
       public System.Guid Id
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "data")]
       public virtual OAddressData Data
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "collections")]
       public virtual SeAdddress Collection { get; set; }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class HAddressData
   {
       [DataMember(Name = "city")]
       public string City { get; set; }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class OAddressData
   {
   
       [DataMember(Name = "city")]
       public string City { get; set; }
    }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class SeAdddress
   {
       [DataMember(Name = "houseaddress")]
       public virtual List<HAdddress> SECAdddress { get; set; }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class SeAdddress2
   {
   [DataMember(Name = "id")]
       public System.Guid Id
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "data")]
       public virtual BaseAddress Data
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   }
   

   [DataContract]
   public class BaseModel
   {
   }

   //-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   object to serialize
   //-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   var aModel = new AddressModel
   {
   Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
   Data = new BaseAddress() {FirstName = "RamaNaresh", LastName = "Talluri", City = "Atlanta"},
   Collections = new AddressCollection()
   {
   HAdddress = new List<HAdddress>()
   {
   new HAdddress() {Id = Guid.NewGuid(), Data = new HAddressData() {City = "CAToronto"}}
   },
   OAdddress = new List<OAdddress>()
   {
   new OAdddress()
   {
   Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
   Data = new OAddressData() {City = "USAlpharetta"},
   Collection = new SeAdddress()
   {
   SECAdddress =
   new List<HAdddress>()
   {
   new HAdddress()
   {
   Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
   Data = new HAddressData() {City = "CA_Downtown"}
   }
   }
   }
   }
   }
   }
   };

   jsScope.ExcludePropertyReferences= new []{"Officeaddress.houseaddress.city"};

   Thanks

   Currently ExcludePropertyReferences is expecting DeclaringTypeName.DataContractName. Its more helpful if the type is fully qualified.

   for example ; from below Json if we want to exclude :{"Officeaddress.houseaddress.city"}; .

   Json:
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   {"id":"eb26f100-3758-4a19-806b-cd5af44f88a4","data":{"lname":"Talluri","firstname":"RamaNaresh","city":"Atlanta"},"collections":{"houseaddress":[{"id":"126e057d-e91b-42ec-b40d-bdba9c831d64","data":{"city":"CAToronto"}}],"officeaddress":[{"id":"5ff48bd4-bfe2-4721-adf1-3f5cd3b5c736","data":{"city":"USAlpharetta"},"collections":{"houseaddress":[{"id":"aad21efc-2768-4518-a505-71dc8b82ad40","data":{"city":"CA_Downtown"}}]}}]}}
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Model :
   //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   [DataContract]
   public class AddressModel : BaseModel
   {
   [DataMember(Name = "id")]
   public System.Guid Id
   {
   get;
   set;
   }

       [DataMember(Name = "data")]
       public virtual BaseAddress Data
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   
       [DataMember(Name = "collections")]
       public virtual AddressCollection Collections
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
   }
   
   [DataContract]
   public class BaseAddress
   {
   
       [DataMember(Name = "lname")]
       public string LastName
       {
           get;
           set;
       }
       [DataMember(Name = "firstname")]
       public string FirstName
       {
           get;
           set;

   … more
   27 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Option to maintain references when serializing/deserializing.

   My use-case is serializing compound DTO objects before sending them over the wire. There is no escaping the possibility that multiple references may exist. I can try to hack a solution that maintains references before/after serialization, but I really think this should be included in the serialization process as an option if at all possible.

   There is already an older post on Stack Overflow about this, and I think (hope? ;) others would want the functionality as well.

   http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11644905/serialize-deserialize-complex-type-to-json-with-object-references-and-dictionari)

   I didn't want to bump that, so I'll add my comments here:

   Currently, PCLs are significantly growing in popularity, as cross-platform development (Interoperability and mobility of objects) becomes increasingly important. Because of this trend, more complex object serialization because more important.

   In my particular use-case, I have a transport object that contains some code inside of it to move among logical nodes (intra-process, inter-process, client-server, etc.). This is largely possible due to the shift toward PCLs, and I think I won't be alone in this kind of structure.

   I would use BinaryFormatter if at all possible, but it isn't available in PCLs. Json.NET has problems with PCL implementations, and other serialization implementations I've found don't have the active development that Service Stack does - that's why I bought a license for the serializer in the first place. Active and good!

   I know you have a ton of other features on the boil, but I think maintaining references in any of your serializers (not necessarily Json) would be a huge success in moving toward the PCL world. That's my three cents.

   My use-case is serializing compound DTO objects before sending them over the wire. There is no escaping the possibility that multiple references may exist. I can try to hack a solution that maintains references before/after serialization, but I really think this should be included in the serialization process as an option if at all possible.

   There is already an older post on Stack Overflow about this, and I think (hope? ;) others would want the functionality as well.

   http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11644905/serialize-deserialize-complex-type-to-json-with-object-references-and-dictionari)

   I didn't want to bump that, so I'll add my comments here:

   Currently, PCLs are significantly growing in popularity, as… more

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Allow customization of ModelDefinition in ORM Lite

   I need to be able to customize the ModelDefinition after it is generated by ORM Lite. I propose adding a method to IOrmLiteDialectProvider named CustomizeModelDefinition(ModelDefinition modelDef). In the base dialect providers, there are multiple methods used to create ModelDefinitions. I propose that all of those calls be routed through one method in OrmLiteConfig.GetModelMetadata(this Type modelType). In that method, after the model is created, it would invoke DialectProvider.CustomizeModelDefinition(modelDef). I downloaded and implemented this and tested it. It didn't take long and worked well. I would be happy to share the code.

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   4 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Akin to Swagger, please provide built in support for RAML

   RAML (see raml.org) is pretty sweet as a design tool... like Swagger 2.0, you can design your full API and corresponding documentation in the designer tools.

   It would be nice to have ServiceStack support reading RAML generated specs and automagically create the corresponding ServiceStack API with stubbed in methods.

   One of the nice things about RAML is the ability to generate a mock JSON responses and/or status codes from a specified endpoint as directed by the RAML designer tools. This allows it easy for other peer developers (and regression tools) to consume your service although it might still be under development or is incomplete.

   RAML (see raml.org) is pretty sweet as a design tool... like Swagger 2.0, you can design your full API and corresponding documentation in the designer tools.

   It would be nice to have ServiceStack support reading RAML generated specs and automagically create the corresponding ServiceStack API with stubbed in methods.

   One of the nice things about RAML is the ability to generate a mock JSON responses and/or status codes from a specified endpoint as directed by the RAML designer tools. This allows it easy for other peer developers (and regression tools) to consume your service although it might still be under… more

   55 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Add Navigation Properties To POCOs

   Entity Framework currently has navigation properties for foreign keys to other tables. Having this feature in OrmLite would be absolutely amazing.

   16 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Security audits

   I would love to see a security audit on the source code done at major milestones. You don't need to do them on each minor version, but one per year would be ideal.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Pull MiniProfiler out of SS providing OOTB integration

   MiniProfiler would be an external package to streamline the upgrade path. We would be able to use up to date versions of MiniProfiler and its "newer" features (in my case I want to use client side profiling in Razor Views).

   It would be great to maintain the existing "integration" by having OOTB support for SS services, request and response filters profiling.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Appsettings with wildchar get Api

   Possibility to get all the keys via wildchar ...For example retrieve all the items that starts with "widget:" and store them in a dictionary <string, T>

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Add BulkInsert/Bulk Copy to the ormlite databases you can

   Being able to bulk insert/copy would be cool.

   Adding support in so I could just take a list and

   Db.BulkCopy(listOfObjects);

   would be pretty sweet.

   SqlServer has the bulkCopy object, postgres has the copy command, sqlite has import (although no idea how well that works) , and mysql...well...who cares (i don't know what they have)

   Having a single interface for bulk copying objects into different databases I think would be a nice feature for ormlite. (not sure how feasible)

   118 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   4 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. add Trace method to ILog/Log

    Add a Trace method to Log/ILog in do verbose logging

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Allow filtering of services on metadata page by endpoint

    If you have many services, which you also want to provide via soap and other endpoint types and thus need multiple for each http verb. It would be great to be able to filter the metadata page based on endpoints (JSON, JSV, SOAP, Protobuf, etc.).
    Similare to the already provided filter function or via chechboxes to turn each endpoint on and off.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Add feature "Named Type Registrations" to IOC

    IOC container based on convention such as below address

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn178463(v=pandp.30).aspx#sec21

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. A registry of 3rd party plugins, features, etc.

    Host or maintain a list of 3rd party ServiceStack extensions, similar to ngmodules.org for AngularJS, the listing capability of npmjs.org, or http://plugins.telerik.com/ for Telerik AppBuilder.

    The list needs not be actively curated, but a single source where packages are listed and links to download / source code.

    As the user base of ServiceStack grows, people are building more extensions that don't necessarily belong in the core modules, and this type of list would provide a great way of bringing attention to them, outside of hard-to-find NuGet packages.

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. When calling services on the same server I would like to bind to the services using named pipes for most efficient inter proces communicati
    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. AppHostMqListenerBase: AppHost with automatically registered MQ message handlers

    Create [self-hosted] apphost where all request messages are automatically registered to the MQ message service,
    so that all services can be accessed via MQ without the need to register every request type manually with something like "mqServer.RegisterHandler<Hello>(...)" .

    It would be nice if the order of operations of the mq message handling could be further aligned to the http variant.

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Async PostFileWithRequest

    Please add overload for PostFileWithRequest which is asynchronous in the same way SendAsync is implemented in ServiceClientBase - meaning an overload which accepts success/error Actions and the other which returns Task, or if both are not possible then just the latter.

    This is mainly because in Silverlight sync APIs are not "welcome" which means we have to 'manually' call this API in an async manner.

    Thanks!

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Deeper SignalR Integration

    I'd like to see a deeper integration between ServiceStack and SignalR. Here are a few ideas that I've so far ran into...

    1. A Hub Authorization Attribute which implements IAuthorizeHubConnection and/or IAuthorizeHubMethodInvocation.

    2. Some sort of JsonServiceClient integration with HubConnections. Maybe automatically associating Cookies with a new HubConnection. Plus exception handling wrappers (i.e. Like an Unauthorized exception is thrown within a SignalR exception).

    3. Centralized documentation outlining what needs to be changed in the web.config for SignalR to co-exist with ServiceStack. Also why the UseBufferedStream property should be enabled for SignalR.

    4. This might require a separate feature request but an updated example app showing SignalR 2.0 integrated with ServiceStack 4.x. Only Examples I've seen have been with SignalR 1.x

    I'd like to see a deeper integration between ServiceStack and SignalR. Here are a few ideas that I've so far ran into...

    1. A Hub Authorization Attribute which implements IAuthorizeHubConnection and/or IAuthorizeHubMethodInvocation.

    2. Some sort of JsonServiceClient integration with HubConnections. Maybe automatically associating Cookies with a new HubConnection. Plus exception handling wrappers (i.e. Like an Unauthorized exception is thrown within a SignalR exception).

    3. Centralized documentation outlining what needs to be changed in the web.config for SignalR to co-exist with ServiceStack. Also why the UseBufferedStream property should be enabled for SignalR.

    4. This might require a separate feature request but an updated example app… more

    151 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    started  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    The way ServiceStack and SignalR will be able to integrate in future will be through .NET Core’s IApplicationBuilder pipeline which by design supports running multiple frameworks within the same App that can now share the same default route namespace.

    From the v4.5.2, ServiceStack now supports running on .NET Core, please see the guide in the full release notes which shows how to register ServiceStack’s AppHost in .NET Core: http://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v4.5.2.html

    SignalR for .NET Core has yet to be released but it’s expected you’ll be able to access SignalR via its dependencies registered in .NET Core’s Startup which will also be injected in your Services like normal IOC dependencies.

    We’ll update this feature request again with an example showing a demo of ServiceStack + SignalR together in the same App once SignalR is available on .NET Core in 2017.

18. Add WebSocket support to ServiceStack
    71 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    We’ve added support for Server Sent Events (SSE) as an integrated Server Notifications option that can be used as an alternative for Web Sockets at: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Server-Events

19. Configurable Webservices Host container

    Have a user configurable host container (maybe developed as an example) that would permit to upload "Servicestack components" and let the admin configure custom routes at runtime, giving a single place where to combine different webservices projects, configure authentication, caching and see performance graphs.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. 1. HATEOAS (RDF/Semantic web support for entities), 2. ASP-Net Indentity Authentication Integration (http://www.asp.net/identity/)

    I've read somewhere where you don't see the need for hateoas support Demis, but I'd encourage you to revisit the subject... RDF semantic web is growing (ie RDFa), so at least support for applying sematic attributes to each object could be helpful (ie FOAF, Dublin Core, etc.)

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close