133 results found

1. enum information in the metadata page

   according to this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22072109/is-there-a-way-to-have-a-servicestack-metadata-page-show-all-the-options-for-an

   it's not possible to have enum information show up in the metadata page, but only in swagger .. it would be nice to have such allowed enum values in metadata page as well.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Add support for non-ambient TypeScript module generation in ssutil

   While having typing information in an ambient module (d.ts) is great for most use cases it doesn't cover the following two problems:

   • Using enums declared in an ambient module: The enums are not compiled to JavaScript objects and can therefore not be used
   • Creating instances of DTOs: You cannot create an instance of a DTO if it is an interface.

   My suggestion is to have the possibility to create a normal TypeScript module with classes instead of interfaces and exported enums which can be compiled to JavaScript.

   Currently the following ambient module is created

   declare module api
   {
   interface MyDTO
   {
   foo: string;
   bar: MyEnum;
   }

   enum MyEnum
   {
       foo,
       bar,
       baz,
   }
   

   This is what should be possible to create:

   module api
   {
   export class MyDTO
   {
   foo: string;
   bar: MyEnum;
   }

   export const enum MyEnum
   {
       foo,
       bar,
       baz,
   }
   

   This is what we currently want to do, but are not able to:

   class Foo
   {
   constructor()
   {
   var dto = new MyDTO(); // not possible because MyDTO is an interface
   dto.bar = MyEnum.foo; // not possible because MyEnum is not compiled to a JavaScript object
   }
   }

   While having typing information in an ambient module (d.ts) is great for most use cases it doesn't cover the following two problems:

   • Using enums declared in an ambient module: The enums are not compiled to JavaScript objects and can therefore not be used
   • Creating instances of DTOs: You cannot create an instance of a DTO if it is an interface.

   My suggestion is to have the possibility to create a normal TypeScript module with classes instead of interfaces and exported enums which can be compiled to JavaScript.

   Currently the following ambient module is created

   declare module api
   {
   interface MyDTO… more

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   Since this seems to be a popular option we’ve added a friendlier url to enable this option:

   TypeScript module:
   http://test.servicestack.net/types/typescript

   Definition file:
   http://test.servicestack.net/types/typescript.d

   We’ve also added an index containing links to all the supported languages at:
   http://test.servicestack.net/types

3. support swagger 2.0

   in order to tie into the ecosystem of self-describing APIs supporting Swagger 2.0 definitions, I would like to suggest support for this version of swagger. This is particularly necessary for supporting Azure Web Api Apps....the only way to create an Azure API app currently appears to be to use the Swashbuckle Generator (which means using WebApi instead of ServiceStack) or hand-crafting the definition file.

   212 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   9 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   We’re happy to announce Open API support is now available from v4.5.8. Please see the release notes for details including walk through on using Open API to add your Services in Azure API Management and generating typed clients using Azure’s AutoRest: http://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v4.5.8

   Documentation for this feature is availble at: http://docs.servicestack.net/openapi

4. ORMLite - Add attribute to ignore property on updates

   It'd be nice to have an attribute to apply to data DTOs that would cause them to be excluded if an update statement is executed.

   Use case: Auditing
   I have an IAudit interface that looks like (basically copied from Demis' answer here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21803999/are-interceptors-possible-in-servicestack-ormlite)

   public IAudited{
   string CreatedBy {get; set;}
   DateTime CreatedDate {get;set;}
   string ModifiedBy {get;set;}
   string ModifiedDate {get;set;}
   }

   Using OrmLite's insert filter makes it easy to generate values for the interface members when setting, as I can get the current user and Date and use them for both the Created and Modified fields. On an update though, I need to fetch the CreatedBy and CreatedDate fields for the record so I can populate the DTO before sending to the database

   i.e. this will throw a null exception unless I previously populated the CreatedDate
   OrmLiteConfig.UpdateFilter = (dbCmd, row) =>
   {
   var auditRow = row as IAudit;
   if (auditRow != null)
   {
   auditRow.ModifiedDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
   }
   };

   I'd like to be able to
   public Audited : IAudited{
   [IgnoreOnUpdate]
   public string CreatedBy {get;set;}
   [IgnoreOnUpdate]
   public DateTime CreatedDate {get;set;}

   public string ModifiedBy {get;set;}
   public DateTime ModifiedDate {get;set;}
   }

   and have the generated sql not try to update the CreatedBy and CreatedDate fields and then the auditing would be transparent to the repository code

   It'd be nice to have an attribute to apply to data DTOs that would cause them to be excluded if an update statement is executed.

   Use case: Auditing
   I have an IAudit interface that looks like (basically copied from Demis' answer here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21803999/are-interceptors-possible-in-servicestack-ormlite)

   public IAudited{
   string CreatedBy {get; set;}
   DateTime CreatedDate {get;set;}
   string ModifiedBy {get;set;}
   string ModifiedDate {get;set;}
   }

   Using OrmLite's insert filter makes it easy to generate values for the interface members when setting, as I can get the current user and Date and use them for both the Created and Modified fields. On an update though, I… more

   19 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   You can use the [IgnoreOnUpdate] and [IgnoreOnInsert] to ignore properties on Update/Insert

5. Make virtual some methods in OrmLiteAuthRepository

   It's possibile to make inheritable some methods in OrmLiteAuthRepository class, to allow custom logics?

   For example CreateUserAuth, UpdateUserAuth, CreateOrMergeAuthSession, GetPermissions/Role, Has Permission/Roles, etc

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   All OrmLiteAuthRepository public API’s are now virtual from this commit: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/487a64ee81a46fd5bcbf83a03d6dade5965ca6ed

   This change is available from v4.0.43+ that’s now available on MyGet: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/MyGet

6. Allow us to use Geography data type in Sql Server

   It would be nice to be able to take advantage of the Geography type in Sql Server... even better, I wonder if there would be a way to allow "us" to define custom classes for these more advanced data types that are built into a database.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   Support for SQL Server GEO types added in latest v4.0.44 release: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.OrmLite/wiki/SQL-Server-Types

   OrmLite Type Converters now allows you to extend OrmLite to support new Types:
   https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.OrmLite/wiki/OrmLite-Type-Converters

7. Allow debuggable Razor views

   Microsoft's ASP.Net MVC allows users to set breakpoints in Razor views and debug them in Visual Studio. It would be splendid if ServiceStack could do the same

   10 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   Thanks for Uri Hendler for pointing it out, this has now been enabled from this commit: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/e2825b9655cda28910b65bb306e82ceeb3b7e36a

   You’ll be able to debug Razor Views in DebugMode of by explicitly setting RazorFormat.IncludeDebugInfo = true;

   Available from v4.0.45+ that’s now on MyGet:
   https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/MyGet

8. Allow sub-select SqlExpression in Sql.In clauses

   The Load* methods already do this internally (sort-of), but allow explicitly creating Where expressions that use a sub-select to get the IDs, instead of the Sql.In() utility. Or possibly reworking Sql.In to support a Select with a single column.

   Something like this:
   var customers = Db.From<Customers>().Where( ... my complex expression ... ).Select("Id");

   var orders = Db.Select<Orders>(q => Sql.In(q.CustomerId, customers);

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Deprecate or update docs.servicstack.net

   Can you either shelve or update docs.servicestack.net? They appear to be very out-of-date, but keep showing up in search results. While most of the information is relevant, its incomplete and occasionally misleading.

   19 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

   We’ve finally replaced this with our new Github-powered Docs website, check it out!

   http://docs.servicestack.net

10. OrmLite T4 templates doesn't generate Views

    OrmLite T4 templates should generate Views,

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Need to change IncludeViews in OrmLite.Core.ttinclude to:

    bool IncludeViews = true;

11. Please InClude ParameterizedSqlExpression.cs to ServiceStack.OrmLiteV45 Project

    ParameterizedSqlExpression.cs not in ServiceStack.OrmLiteV45 Project, It affected use oracle provider in net framework 4.5.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Now fixed from v4.0.43+ that’s now on MyGet: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/MyGet

12. Allow LoadSingleById to selectively load references

    Would like to replicate the functionality from this feature request in LoadSingleById: http://servicestack.uservoice.com/forums/176786-feature-requests/suggestions/6656885-allow-loadselect-to-selectively-load-references

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    This has been implemented by Johann Klemmack and is now available in v4.0.48, see examples at: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/blob/master/docs/2015/release-notes.md#custom-load-references

13. Integrate with Thinktecture.IdentityProvider

    I would like to have an OpenId and OAuth integration with Thinktecture.IdentityServer just like google and Facebook. I would like to implement my own SSO instead of relying on social networking OpenId

    42 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Please see Using IdentityServer4 Auth in ServiceStack

    https://docs.servicestack.net/authentication-identityserver

14. Command Line/Buildserver support for ServiceStack references

    We use the ServiceStackVS extension to generate TypeScript code for our service.
    During development (when the API might still change) it would be really nice is we could generate the TypeScript code as a step in the build process to make sure our TypeScript projects are always build against the latest API (and fail when there are breaking changes).

    Although we currently only use the TypeScript generator I assume the same applies to the other languages as well.

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    ssutil.exe was added in v4.0.42: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Add-ServiceStack-Reference#ssutilexe---command-line-servicestack-reference-tool

15. Update fluent validation library

    There are bug-fixes and improvements made to the original fluent validation source at:

    https://github.com/JeremySkinner/FluentValidation/

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Fluent Validation has been updated to the latest release in v4.58:

    http://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v4.5.8#fluent-validation-upgraded

    Which also includes built-in support for Async Validators

16. Show required authentication & Authorization within metadata page

    I'd like to have the DTO required(set at DTO and/or service level using current attributes) Authentication & Authorization(roles+permissions) showed within the metadata page, among other operation/dto details.

    See SO question http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29693572/how-to-show-authentication-authorization-within-metadata-operation-page.

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Now added from v4.0.43+ that’s now on MyGet.

    See StackOverflow answer for details: http://stackoverflow.com/a/31909174/85785

17. OrmLite Join Aliases

    Joining on the same table multiple times results in incorrect SQL being generated by OrmLite.

    Table aliases need to be added automatically by OrmLite so the correct SQL is generated when joining on the same table multiple times.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    Support for Typed JOIN aliases were added in v4.0.62: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.OrmLite#join-aliases

18. Ability to override OrmLiteCacheClient to change CacheEntry table name

    However it would be best to accomplish, it would be rad to be able to have our own Alias for the CacheEntry object inside OrmLiteCacheClient. We are sharing a database between multiple web apps, but don't want to share the same CacheEntry table.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    The CacheEntry table can be replaced with
    OrmLiteCacheClient generic class, an example of this is in v4.5.6: http://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v4.5.6#sql-server-features

19. Add Email Templating Engine

    Similar to ServiceStack Bundler, it'd be fantastic to have a node.js-powered email templating system for generating transactional emails with custom data payloads out of a SS app.

    It'd be great if the engine worked with simple html templates and CSS so that non-C# people can get involved. Something super simple to use and set up, but powerful in execution.

    This would make emails:

    • testable
    • collaborative (e.g. with frontend engineers)
    • iterable (easy transactional email multivariate testing?)
    • CSS automatic inlining
    • optional integration with litmus.com?
    18 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    The latest v5.2 release includes a powerful and easy to use template system which is ideal for non-devs to create email templates:

    https://docs.servicestack.net/releases/v5.2#servicestack-templates-remastered

    The Background MQ provides a great way to send emails in the background:
    http://docs.servicestack.net/background-mq

    A working example of this is available in TechStacks:
    https://github.com/NetCoreApps/TechStacks#background-mq-service

    Whilst the Email Templates use-case shows an example of generating text + html emails with markdown:
    http://templates.servicestack.net/usecases/email-templates

20. visual studio 2015 extension

    Service Stack extension for visual studio does not work in visual studio 2015. please add this extension

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminDemis J Bellot (Developer, ServiceStack) responded

    ServiceStackVS was updated to support VS 2015